Or more accurately: Some “Thoughts” on Indian Culture
Or even more accurately: Some Thoughts on Foreign Perceptions of Indian Culture
So I’ve spoken with three Americans, three Germans, and one Belgian since leaving Kathmandu almost two weeks ago. At some point in all these conversations, the topic of traveling in India has transformed into the topic of culture in India. Without fail, other tourists I’ve talked to had mostly negative things to say about their experience with Indian people: “It’s like they screw you over because they want to win, and they do it to each other too, “ or “The economic system here is not good, and it’s their fault too,” or “I don’t mean to sound racist, but I really don’t like Indian people.” And it was in contrast to otherwise liberal perspectives on other topics, like the war in Iraq, or social welfare.
Let me disclaim before I continue my commentary: All generalizations are inaccurate, and it is possible that I’ve managed to only speak to the most aggreived travelers through India, and I should say that any generalizations I do make about India are based on very limited exposure to the culture here.
What do I think about Indian culture? First, I think that any statements have to take into consideration that the vast majority of people I’ve interacted with are in some form of the tourist business and that the economics of the business must create a very different culture than what should be considered “Indian” culture. Second, India is almost as geographically large as the U.S., and has a population more than four times that of the U.S., so to speak of an Indian culture must be even more inaccurate than to speak of an American culture.
But why, where the American tourist industry – suck as hotel concierges, etc. – seems to generate an aura of artificial hospitality, does the Indian tourist industry generate such aggressiveness and pushiness? And that is a badly weighted question itself, because the hotels that Danielle and I stayed in (five and four star hotels) the service was excellent and the people polite. So what I’m really talking about is the rickshaw-wallahs, street-shop owners, children, and beggars; in other words, the poorer side of the tourist industry.
My working theory is not particularly insightful: Poverty creates desperation and desperation manifests as aggressiveness. In a country where beggars mutilate their children so they can earn more alms, and older children beat up the younger ones who get rupees from tourists, it isn’t hard to imagine that the people who succeed (relatively speaking) aren’t the ones who provide the best service to their customers (or benefactors, in the case of beggars), but those who can beat out the hundreds of other people competing for the same business. So the rickshaw-wallahs are aggressive, not because they think that will appeal to customers, but because aggression is the only way to make sure the next rickshaw-wallah doesn’t take their customer away. And there are seven hundred shops on one street selling the identical bangles, hippie-shirts, and cold water that advertisement becomes volume and the content is irrelevant.
Two Indian men has seperately told me that the “problem” with India (or maybe Delhi specifically) is over-population. Boby, the rickshaw-wallah I’ve been hanging out with, said, and I quote: “Do you know what the problem with India? Population. I have
six children!” Raj, the same person I spoke to about the Maharashtra blasts, simply said that with enormous regret in his voice that population was the problem with India. On a personal note, Raj asked me for American coins because his 9 year old son wants to have the best coin collection in his fourth-grade class. And Boby’s wife is currently in the hospital with back problems, so send good wishes his way.
But I started at the root of the problem without describing what it really is. And talking with these other Western tourists has left me with an unanswered personal inquiry, namely, why don’t I have the same, visceral, negative reaction to all the people grabbing and shouting at me as I walk down the street. Objectively, I can sympathize with the sentiments of those who have expressed frustration with India. There are beggars every five steps in the tourist areas of Delhi. Cycle and auto-rickshaw drivers cut in front of you to ask if you want a ride. Everyone overcharges tourists – in Varanasi the quoted prices were at least 200% of the final price I managed to get, and even in Nepal (where the culture is quite different, except for the tourist areas) I was quoted Rs. 2500 for a singing bowl and after some half-hearted haggling had the guy at Rs. 350. And it’s not just the prices, it’s trying to do the things you want to. Getting a rickshaw is challenging if you don’t want to visit the “government” shops. At a travel agent, I spent at least ten minutes telling the guy I didn’t want a driver through Rajasthan for $700 and that sleeper trains were fine. Even then, he asked for Rs. 6500, and I fortunately waited to go to the foreign tourist office at the train station where all five trains were a mere Rs. 900. And I’ve already written some about involuntary guides at temples and tourist sights.
But the personal inquiry is that these things don’t really bother me. I’ve had only one or two experiences of genuine frustration with someone. Otherwise, I’m mostly entertained by figuring out the best strategy to avoid unwanted offers or requests. I’m convinced that the best strategy is to completely ignore whoever is trying to get your attention (it works on everyone except begging mothers, who clutch at your clothing and follow for blocks and blocks). But it’s hard, and a little monotonous, to ignore everyone around you. I’ve found that saying “nahee” or “mujhe nahee chahiye” is significantly more effective than just saying “no” (which is the hindi word for “nine”). Singing “nahee” at the top of my lungs has sufficiently baffled a few persistent touts. “Chalao,” or the ruder “jao” (“go away”) work sometimes, but I had one young man in Fatephur Sikri tell me “why should I go? This is my home, you are visitor, you go! It is not a good person.” Assuming he meant “you” and not “it,” he at least had a point that I was the visitor and he was the resident. And sometimes, I give in to somewhat cruel humor and either quote absurdly low prices, “ten rupees!” or tell rickshaw drivers that I want to go somewhere totally ridiculous. That actually led to one of my favorite impromptu interactions.
Rickshaw-wallah: “Where do you want to go?”
Me: “We want to go to the moon!”
RW: “Oh, I like the sun; I like more the warm. The moon it is too cold.”
When people tell me that they can get me “anything,” I’ve asked for a solid gold toilet – which has let to offers to both find a toilet and sell me gold bullion.
But walking around with other tourists, I’m surprised by how angry some of them have gotten, some yelling angrily at small children. The Lonely Planet Nepal says that raising your voice is never effective and I think that has contributed a bit to my attitude, but not entirely. Passivity and conflict-avoidance or tolerance and open-mindedness? That dichotomy probably doesn not capture everything, but I’ve been trying to figure out what it is, why I find most of it funny instead of grueling.
And since the comment about how Indians treat each other, I’ve been trying to pay more attention to interactions between local people on the street. Today, for instance, our rickshaw was revving loudly as it tried to escape a particularly deep pothole and a young man walking by instinctively helped push us along. And Manush and Boby, or restaurant and hotel operators are gentle with beggars while shooing them away from their storefronts.
[It's now 12:30am here and I'm going to bed, but I'll try to finish my thoughts on this tomorrow before going to Jaipur in the evening]